Higher level people at linkedin: legal@linkedin.com privacy@linkedin.com mscomp@microsoft.com

 Dear 'higher level' Linkedin, legal@linkedin.com privacy@linkedin.com mscomp@microsoft.com


My name is J. Philippe Blankert (Jean Philippe Blankert), premium linkedin user with email internetavenue@outlook.com

I have 2 problems:
1) linkedin_nl@cs.linkedin.com does not help me, it 'restricted' my account, it refuses to explain why and it totaly does not comply with EU law



The correspondence with Linkedin Netherlands you see here on my blog:

https://linkedin-exclusion.blogspot.com/

2) Persona never approves my modern Dutch id with NFC chip.  After scanning it always says: 'could not verify your document'. It did not succeed with Samsung A33, and not with newer S25.

THere is really a bug with Persona. support@withpersona.com blames linkedin. No help there either.

Is there a possibility I can send you by email copies of my id, front and back, approved by a notary?

For my leads and clients, I am totally dependent on linkedin, and now I am shut out since 18 August 2025

I find linked_nl@cs.linkedin.com totally unhelpful. Before starting a lawsuit, I am now attempting to reach people with IQ over 100 to understand my problem and help me out.


Can you reply within 48 hours? I am missing leads and contacts, and in a lawsuit I would hold linkedin liable for these losses.

Attached you find my id, front and backside (because Persona is never working - see also reddit, such is the case with many people)

Best regards,

J. Philippe Blankert, internetavenue@outlook.com, 20 August 2025

Reacties

Een reactie posten

Populaire posts van deze blog

EU law violation of linkedin in English

  DSA Obligations Being Violated 1. Article 17 – Obligation to Provide a Reasoned Decision in Case of Account Restriction LinkedIn has restricted your account without providing any concrete justification: no specific violations, facts, or evidence have been cited. This is in breach of Article 17 of the DSA, which requires that such a decision must at least include: what action has been taken (e.g., account restriction), the facts and circumstances on which the decision is based, whether automated assessment has been applied, reference to the applicable legal or contractual basis, and clear information about rights to appeal. (Future of Privacy Forum) 2. Articles 24–42 – Transparency Reporting LinkedIn does not publish a transparency report on the number of restrictions, number of complaints, or the use of automated systems. As a Very Large Online Platform (VLOP), it is required to periodically publish such reports. (IAPP) 3. Articles 25–26 – Fair Platform Inte...
Meer lezen

Wetgeving die Linkedin overtreedt

  DSA-verplichtingen die worden geschonden 1. Artikel 17 – Verplicht met redenen omkleed besluit bij accountbeperking LinkedIn heeft jouw account beperkt zonder concrete motivering : geen specifieke overtredingen, feiten of bewijs genoemd. Dit is in strijd met artikel 17 DSA , dat vereist dat het besluit ten minste omvat: welke handeling is genomen (bijv. accountbeperking), de feiten en omstandigheden waarop het besluit is gebaseerd, of geautomatiseerde beoordeling is toegepast, verwijzing naar toepasselijke juridische of contractuele grond, en duidelijke info over klachtenrechten. Future of Privacy Forum 2. Artikel 24–42 – Transparantierapportage LinkedIn publiceert geen transparantierapport over het aantal beperkingen, het aantal klachten, of gebruik van geautomatiseerde systemen. Als Very Large Online Platform (VLOP) is het verplicht om periodiek zulke rapporten te publiceren. IAPP 3. Artikel 25–26 – Eerlijke platforminteractie en reclame-transpa...
Meer lezen