Verzoek merge accounts 7 maart 2025

LinkedIn Ireland Unlimited Company Attn: legal department Wilton Plaza Wilton Place, Dublin 2 Ireland Amsterdam , [7 March 2025] Case : Blankert / LinkedIn Lawyer: Subject: Request to merge LinkedIn accounts Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing you on behalf of my client Jean Philippe Blankert, operating under his company Blankert Consultancy B.V. This letter follows up on my previous letter dated 14 February with the subject: ‘Urgent request for immediate reinstatement of blocked accounts’. First and foremost, my client sincerely appreciates the unblocking and reinstatement of his primary account linked to internetavenue@outlook.com for his personal profile “Ir. J. Philippe Blankert PhD”. However, my client remains unable to access the other accounts associated with the e-mail addresses listed below. Upon further investigation, it appears that my client inadvertently holds multiple accounts for his personal profile, which is not possible under LinkedIn’s user conditions. My client wishes to rectify this by merging all secondary accounts into his primary account. However, the online form for account merging requires him to include the URLs of the secondary accounts, whereas these URLs are not known to him. Therefore, on behalf of my client, I hereby formally request LinkedIn to merge all accounts based on the information listed below. This merge should include the transfer of all connections, group memberships, messages and content from the accounts that will be closed. The accounts should be merged based on the following information: • Profile URL of the account my client wants to keep open: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ir-jp-blankert/ • E-mail associated with the account my client wants to keep open: internetavenue@outlook.com • E-mails associated with the account my client wants to merge (close): o freeskies@outlook.com o PhilippeBlankert@outlook.com o info@burnout.nl o QML.Blankert@gmail.com o blankertjp@gmail.com Please note that my client does not have access to all the emails associated with the accounts to be merged. Please confirm to me in writing within five business days of receiving this letter, no later than [date], that LinkedIn has complied with the request as described above. A copy of this letter has been sent to LinkedIn Netherlands B.V. We appreciate your prompt cooperation. Kind regards, De Vos & Partners Advocaten N.V. Olivia van Rikxoort - Lawyer

Reacties

Een reactie posten

Populaire posts van deze blog

EU law violation of linkedin in English

  DSA Obligations Being Violated 1. Article 17 – Obligation to Provide a Reasoned Decision in Case of Account Restriction LinkedIn has restricted your account without providing any concrete justification: no specific violations, facts, or evidence have been cited. This is in breach of Article 17 of the DSA, which requires that such a decision must at least include: what action has been taken (e.g., account restriction), the facts and circumstances on which the decision is based, whether automated assessment has been applied, reference to the applicable legal or contractual basis, and clear information about rights to appeal. (Future of Privacy Forum) 2. Articles 24–42 – Transparency Reporting LinkedIn does not publish a transparency report on the number of restrictions, number of complaints, or the use of automated systems. As a Very Large Online Platform (VLOP), it is required to periodically publish such reports. (IAPP) 3. Articles 25–26 – Fair Platform Inte...
Meer lezen

Wetgeving die Linkedin overtreedt

  DSA-verplichtingen die worden geschonden 1. Artikel 17 – Verplicht met redenen omkleed besluit bij accountbeperking LinkedIn heeft jouw account beperkt zonder concrete motivering : geen specifieke overtredingen, feiten of bewijs genoemd. Dit is in strijd met artikel 17 DSA , dat vereist dat het besluit ten minste omvat: welke handeling is genomen (bijv. accountbeperking), de feiten en omstandigheden waarop het besluit is gebaseerd, of geautomatiseerde beoordeling is toegepast, verwijzing naar toepasselijke juridische of contractuele grond, en duidelijke info over klachtenrechten. Future of Privacy Forum 2. Artikel 24–42 – Transparantierapportage LinkedIn publiceert geen transparantierapport over het aantal beperkingen, het aantal klachten, of gebruik van geautomatiseerde systemen. Als Very Large Online Platform (VLOP) is het verplicht om periodiek zulke rapporten te publiceren. IAPP 3. Artikel 25–26 – Eerlijke platforminteractie en reclame-transpa...
Meer lezen

Recht op vrije advocaatskeuze - mr. Olivia van Rikxoort De Vos advocaten Amsterdam

Onderwerp: Beroep op vrije advocaatkeuze en onmiddellijke actie kort geding tegen LinkedIn Geachte dossierbehandelaar, Op 20 augustus heb ik mijn klacht en verzoek om juridische bijstand bij u ingediend. Vandaag is het 27 augustus en ik constateer dat DAS tot op heden geen inhoudelijke voortgang heeft geboekt. Dit is onacceptabel gezien de ernst en urgentie van mijn situatie. Mijn zakelijke bestaan als freelancer is direct gekoppeld aan mijn aanwezigheid op LinkedIn: Ik had daar aantoonbare leads en concrete opdrachten in voorbereiding. Ik kreeg veel reacties op mijn publicaties over AI en wiskunde. Ik onderhield waardevolle contacten, waaronder met het hoofd AI van Meta. ik heb 2 klanten te beantwoorden, waarvan ik geen email adres heb en die alleen op linkedin staan Door de onrechtmatige blokkade van mijn account loop ik ernstige schade op: verlies van leads, reputatie en netwerk. LinkedIn handelt in strijd met de Digital Services Act (geen duidelijke motivering, disproportio...
Meer lezen