Reply to Persona - catch 22 situation Persona and Linkedin

 Dear Walker Wells, support@withpersona.com,


The problem is that Persona never accepts my modern Dutch id with NFC chip.

Since many years I try to verify myself for linkedin through Persona, but the outcome is always the same: Persona cannot verify my data upon scanning front and back of id.

Linkedin points to Persona, and you, Persona, point to linkedin.

It is a catch22 situation, 'Kafka'. I have now a modern Samsung S25, flagship, and I never succeed. I did also not succeed with elder Samsung A33.

Do you know a way out of this?

For my own convenience and millions of others with the same problem, I keep a blog about this exclusion from linkedin.

https://www.blogger.com/blog/posts/5519087102190914230

Thank you in advance for a way out.

Best regards,

J. Philippe Blankert, internetavenue@outlook.com, 19 August 2025

Reacties

Een reactie posten

Populaire posts van deze blog

EU law violation of linkedin in English

  DSA Obligations Being Violated 1. Article 17 – Obligation to Provide a Reasoned Decision in Case of Account Restriction LinkedIn has restricted your account without providing any concrete justification: no specific violations, facts, or evidence have been cited. This is in breach of Article 17 of the DSA, which requires that such a decision must at least include: what action has been taken (e.g., account restriction), the facts and circumstances on which the decision is based, whether automated assessment has been applied, reference to the applicable legal or contractual basis, and clear information about rights to appeal. (Future of Privacy Forum) 2. Articles 24–42 – Transparency Reporting LinkedIn does not publish a transparency report on the number of restrictions, number of complaints, or the use of automated systems. As a Very Large Online Platform (VLOP), it is required to periodically publish such reports. (IAPP) 3. Articles 25–26 – Fair Platform Inte...
Meer lezen

Wetgeving die Linkedin overtreedt

  DSA-verplichtingen die worden geschonden 1. Artikel 17 – Verplicht met redenen omkleed besluit bij accountbeperking LinkedIn heeft jouw account beperkt zonder concrete motivering : geen specifieke overtredingen, feiten of bewijs genoemd. Dit is in strijd met artikel 17 DSA , dat vereist dat het besluit ten minste omvat: welke handeling is genomen (bijv. accountbeperking), de feiten en omstandigheden waarop het besluit is gebaseerd, of geautomatiseerde beoordeling is toegepast, verwijzing naar toepasselijke juridische of contractuele grond, en duidelijke info over klachtenrechten. Future of Privacy Forum 2. Artikel 24–42 – Transparantierapportage LinkedIn publiceert geen transparantierapport over het aantal beperkingen, het aantal klachten, of gebruik van geautomatiseerde systemen. Als Very Large Online Platform (VLOP) is het verplicht om periodiek zulke rapporten te publiceren. IAPP 3. Artikel 25–26 – Eerlijke platforminteractie en reclame-transpa...
Meer lezen

Higher level people at linkedin: legal@linkedin.com privacy@linkedin.com mscomp@microsoft.com

  Dear 'higher level' Linkedin, legal@linkedin.com privacy@linkedin.com mscomp@microsoft.com My name is J. Philippe Blankert (Jean Philippe Blankert), premium linkedin user with email internetavenue@outlook.com I have 2 problems: 1) linkedin_nl@cs.linkedin.com does not help me, it 'restricted' my account, it refuses to explain why and it totaly does not comply with EU law I posted the law Linkedin Netherlands is violating: https://linkedin-exclusion.blogspot.com/2025/08/eu-law-violation-of-linkedin-in-english.html The correspondence with Linkedin Netherlands you see here on my blog: https://linkedin-exclusion.blogspot.com/ 2) Persona never approves my modern Dutch id with NFC chip.  After scanning it always says: 'could not verify your document'. It did not succeed with Samsung A33, and not with newer S25. THere is really a bug with Persona. support@withpersona.com blames linkedin. No help there either. Is there a possibility I can send you by email copies of my...
Meer lezen